GOVERNMENT PROPERTY IS "THE PEOPLES" PROPERTY?
PHILOSOPHICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
It is my understanding that music videos are commercials? They sell music, fashion, politics and even forms for government! The question I have is who owns this commercial? In the USA all government is funded via "the people" through a payment of tax dollars. Thus, those "people" are the government and can "fire" their employees at will.
So, if the USA government is funded by the people then why would a record company publicly voice that they override the PAYING CUSTOMER or "the CLIENT" and assume they own property rights when the only owner would be those purchasing it as in "the customer?" Isn't the "company" just managing the artist's funds? The record company gets all of their funding from the paying customer. Thus, the more that this video is seen the better for the company, people of USA and ultimately the artist.
Why then is their prevention to make less money via promotion of fictitious copy-write law propaganda?
Why then is their prevention to make less money via promotion of fictitious copy-write law propaganda?
No comments:
Post a Comment